 |
![Response]() |
| 1 |
| 1 |
|
Difficulty to differentiate amongst
vendors |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 2 |
| 1 |
|
reinventing the content wheel |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 3 |
| 1 |
|
more of the same |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
| 1 |
|
Recognition of shortcomings of
eLearning |
| 2 |
|
Cost of eLearning |
| 3 |
|
MIsmatch between technology and educational
skills |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 6 |
| 1 |
|
some acquisitions |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 7 |
| 1 |
|
hype about KM |
| 2 |
|
more buzzword bingo "HCPLCKMS" |
| 3 |
|
shotgun marriages |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
| 1 |
|
Continued concern with short term
results |
| 2 |
|
More confusion about standards |
| 3 |
|
Additional technological hype |
| 4 |
|
Imprecision about notion of knowledge
management |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 10 |
| 1 |
|
Competition from India |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 11 |
| 1 |
|
Declines in spending |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 12 |
| 1 |
|
Many vendors will not survive |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 13 |
| 1 |
|
Further mindless consolidation |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 14 |
| 1 |
|
too much consolidation |
| 2 |
|
innovative learning still in
trouble |
| 3 |
|
continued executive backlash |
| 4 |
|
disintermediation of central training
orgs |
| 5 |
|
conference biz contiues to
struggle | |
| 15 |
| 1 |
|
A
substantial e-learning company failure |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
| 1 |
|
Service/Software providers going out of
business |
| 2 |
|
Lack of vision from large software
companies |
| 3 |
|
Lack of strategy from large software
companies |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 18 |
| 1 |
|
Less innovation |
| 2 |
|
More pressure for sound-bite
development |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
| 1 |
|
Continued reluctance to spend |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 21 |
| 1 |
|
increased competition |
| 2 |
|
entries from traditional training
cos |
| 3 |
|
continued consolidation |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 22 |
| 1 |
|
Additional solutions added to the
mix |
| 2 |
|
New inexperienced vendors entering
market |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 23 |
| 1 |
|
the economy sluggish until early
2003 |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 24 |
| 1 |
|
No
money to work with |
| 2 |
|
Push back from too much IT hype |
| 3 |
|
Wait and see attitude |
| 4 |
|
Severe budget cuts to higher ed |
| 5 |
|
Growing awareness of real costs of
IT | |
| 25 |
| 1 |
|
Continued stalled spending |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 26 |
| 1 |
|
continued skepticism about
technology |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 27 |
| 1 |
|
tough economy |
| 2 |
|
continued tough sell for e-learning |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 28 |
| 1 |
|
substitution of "safer" strategies |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 29 |
| 1 |
|
Ongoing short term cost cutting
need |
| 2 |
|
Personnel Fluctuation |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 30 |
| 1 |
|
How for clients to finance bigger
projects |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 31 |
| 1 |
|
Too many small experiments |
| 2 |
|
Too many expensive projects |
| 3 |
|
Although "hype" is over, still fortune
hunters |
| 4 |
|
Little technological integration |
| 5 |
|
Slow develpement as to
standardization | |
| 32 |
| 1 |
|
just lots of behaviorist tests |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 33 |
| 1 |
|
death throes of vendors |
| 2 |
|
negative publicity |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |