 |
![Response]() |
| 1 |
| 1 |
|
Increased buyer awareness of
elearning |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 2 |
| 1 |
|
More uptake of elearning |
| 2 |
|
Better acceptance by trainees |
| 3 |
|
More funding support from local
govt |
| 4 |
|
Building from internal content |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 3 |
| 1 |
|
water seeking its own level |
| 2 |
|
the use of avatars |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 4 |
| 1 |
|
Need for custom content |
| 2 |
|
Budget constraints |
| 3 |
|
Archived Live events make poor Asynch
content |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 5 |
| 1 |
|
Continued economic growth |
| 2 |
|
Progressive move to eLearning |
| 3 |
|
More people with eLearning skills |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 6 |
| 1 |
|
higher expectations for content |
| 2 |
|
dynamic delivery of content |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 7 |
| 1 |
|
understanding |
| 2 |
|
start of simulations |
| 3 |
|
alternate devices |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 8 |
| 1 |
|
focus on doing (integration of KM &
elearning) |
| 2 |
|
simulations & engagement |
| 3 |
|
standards reviewed for learning |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 9 |
| 1 |
|
better acceptability |
| 2 |
|
increased budget |
| 3 |
|
greater awareness amongst buyers |
| 4 |
|
sustained business |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 10 |
| 1 |
|
New ways of thinking about
integration |
| 2 |
|
Renewed interest in training
methodology |
| 3 |
|
Development of strategies for
meta-learning |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 11 |
| 1 |
|
Greater demand for e-learning |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 12 |
| 1 |
|
realistic goals |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
| 1 |
|
standards to improve their benefits |
| 2 |
|
More published ROI cases |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 15 |
| 1 |
|
Better partnerships |
| 2 |
|
Better e-Learning content |
| 3 |
|
Investments from large software
suppliers |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 16 |
| 1 |
|
Further consolidation |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 17 |
| 1 |
|
stablization |
| 2 |
|
broader definitions of e-l |
| 3 |
|
more CLo/CKO |
| 4 |
|
more focus on customers |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 18 |
| 1 |
|
Good products chasing out bad |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 19 |
| 1 |
|
More mergers |
| 2 |
|
More awareness |
| 3 |
|
More demand |
| 4 |
|
New developments |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 20 |
| 1 |
|
Welch( GE) being right about corporate
learning |
| 2 |
|
consolidation |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 21 |
| 1 |
|
Service/Software providers going out of
business |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 22 |
| 1 |
|
Less fluff and more solid stuff |
| 2 |
|
Companies with real products will
survive |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 23 |
| 1 |
|
Strategic vision aligned with business
needs |
| 2 |
|
Integration of standards |
| 3 |
|
Enhanced delivery of unstructured
learning |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 24 |
| 1 |
|
Connection to document management |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 25 |
| 1 |
|
shake-out of low-quality vendors |
| 2 |
|
better tools |
| 3 |
|
improved sales |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 26 |
| 1 |
|
Better ROI understanding |
| 2 |
|
Improved bandwidth |
| 3 |
|
Improving technology understanding |
| 4 |
|
More examples of success |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 27 |
| 1 |
|
more successes across more sectors |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 28 |
| 1 |
|
Continued Consolidation |
| 2 |
|
Continued weeding of the weak |
| 3 |
|
More focus on ROI and impact |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 29 |
| 1 |
|
Sea change toward higher ed reliance on dist
ed |
| 2 |
|
Recognition of need for quality
content |
| 3 |
|
Better tools for collecting content |
| 4 |
|
Better tools for organizing/displaying
content |
| 5 |
|
Incr sophisitication v/v effective learning
| |
| 30 |
| 1 |
|
Greater integration with CMS
technology |
| 2 |
|
More market consolidation-less
fragmentation |
| 3 |
|
More customer-centric approaches to
delivery |
| 4 |
|
More content interactivity |
| 5 |
|
Use of intelligent agents as
facilitators | |
| 31 |
| 1 |
|
integration of elearning with all
processes |
| 2 |
|
online learning models |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 32 |
| 1 |
|
rewards for simple solutions, not extensive
ones |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 33 |
| 1 |
|
Customer will start to order again. |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 34 |
| 1 |
|
companies merging |
| 2 |
|
stronger e-learning companies |
| 3 |
|
more collaboration/alliances btwn.
vendors |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 35 |
| 1 |
|
awareness of training technology |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 36 |
| 1 |
|
forward direction |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 37 |
| 1 |
|
commoditization of platforms |
| 2 |
|
more ERP and intranet integration |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 38 |
| 1 |
|
More awareness for Learning
Investments |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 39 |
| 1 |
|
Dept of Defense games |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 40 |
| 1 |
|
Wireless applications |
| 2 |
|
online social systems |
| 3 |
|
adaptable onine groups |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 41 |
| 1 |
|
low end LMS purchase |
| 2 |
|
low end course development |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 42 |
| 1 |
|
More focus on LCMS and dev. tools |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 43 |
| 1 |
|
Steady growing |
| 2 |
|
Blended learning in business
programs |
| 3 |
|
online learning will also be
growing |
| 4 |
|
international competition |
| 5 |
|
More from public sector, consultants
etc. | |
| 44 |
| 1 |
|
more awareness of 'openness' |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 45 |
| 1 |
|
same as in Question #3 - but more |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 46 |
| 1 |
|
more realistic expectations |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|