 |
 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
|
Increased buyer awareness of
eLearning |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 2 |
| 1 |
|
Understanding of elearning at corporate
level |
| 2 |
|
exit of small players |
| 3 |
|
return to developing content as key |
| 4 |
|
reduction of price from LMS players |
| 5 |
|
elearning remained a need and not a
fad | |
| 3 |
| 1 |
|
movement away from canned content |
| 2 |
|
willingness to take some risks |
| 3 |
|
willingness to forego bells and
whistles |
| 4 |
|
get into a mode to use custom
solutions |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 4 |
| 1 |
|
Better understanding of LMS roles |
| 2 |
|
Better understanding of LCMS roles |
| 3 |
|
Gartner Magic quadrant |
| 4 |
|
Realization that Synch. doesn't solve all
problems |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 5 |
| 1 |
|
Government promotion of eLearning |
| 2 |
|
Increase in corporate training |
| 3 |
|
Continued economic growth |
| 4 |
|
Increasing international trade |
| 5 |
|
Lower willingness to
travel | |
| 6 |
| 1 |
|
LCMSs |
| 2 |
|
increased focus on simulations |
| 3 |
|
concern about content quality |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 7 |
| 1 |
|
acceptance of standards |
| 2 |
|
improved tools |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 8 |
| 1 |
|
focus on engagement |
| 2 |
|
more emphasis on standards |
| 3 |
|
focus on learning (not technology) |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 9 |
| 1 |
|
increased awareness of elearning |
| 2 |
|
increased move towards ASP hosting |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 10 |
| 1 |
|
Curiosity Shown by few Large
Customers |
| 2 |
|
Half Harted Attempts Made |
| 3 |
|
Trying to learn about e-learning
benefits |
| 4 |
|
quantifying benefits |
| 5 |
|
small budgets made
available | |
| 11 |
| 1 |
|
Questioning the technology |
| 2 |
|
Reformulating the question of
standards |
| 3 |
|
Broadening the theory to include informal
learning |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 12 |
| 1 |
|
Greater acceptance for e-learning |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 13 |
| 1 |
|
people reflecting |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 14 |
| 1 |
|
Continued support for existing
projects |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 15 |
| 1 |
|
Better Understanding of benefits by
users |
| 2 |
|
real live sites proving ROI |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 16 |
| 1 |
|
Increasing number of pilots |
| 2 |
|
Increase in use of technology |
| 3 |
|
Quality knowledge of learning at board
level |
| 4 |
|
Use of blended learning |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 17 |
| 1 |
|
Realistic Customers with real Business
probs. |
| 2 |
|
LMS & LCMS both available from same
vendor |
| 3 |
|
Consolidation |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 18 |
| 1 |
|
more interest in KM |
| 2 |
|
some custom houses still hangging
on |
| 3 |
|
seemingly fewer failures more
recently |
| 4 |
|
that's it, pretty depressing right
now |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 19 |
| 1 |
|
Development of courseware standards by
ASTD |
| 2 |
|
Less overselling of e-learning's
promise |
| 3 |
|
Fewer knee-jerk attacks on
e-learning |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 20 |
| 1 |
|
recognition of eLearning value |
| 2 |
|
investment into initial projects |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 21 |
| 1 |
|
Merging of elearning companies |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 22 |
| 1 |
|
Blended Learning encroaching on ILT |
| 2 |
|
ROI for eLearning instead of face t
face |
| 3 |
|
Centra, webex, Brainshark type services
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 23 |
| 1 |
|
Wall Street more aware of eLearning
companies |
| 2 |
|
US
Gov't. increased involvement with eLearning |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 24 |
| 1 |
|
Greater focus on bottom-line impact of
learning |
| 2 |
|
Learning folks having to have a bottom-line
focus |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 25 |
| 1 |
|
strong need for online delivery of
training |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 26 |
| 1 |
|
KM
customers interest in eLearning |
| 2 |
|
Remote training as offering for
SMEs |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 27 |
| 1 |
|
broader range of organizations using
e-learning |
| 2 |
|
renewed interest from old-time users of
e-learning |
| 3 |
|
much better development tools |
| 4 |
|
fewer concerns about "does it
work?" |
| 5 |
|
| |
| 28 |
| 1 |
|
Technology shake out |
| 2 |
|
Fringe vendors leaving the market |
| 3 |
|
Client understanding of
technologies |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 29 |
| 1 |
|
more receptivity to e-learning |
| 2 |
|
preferences expressed e-learning over
ILT |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 30 |
| 1 |
|
Survival of the fittest - weeding out of the
weak |
| 2 |
|
Organizations thinking about how to deploy
eL |
| 3 |
|
A
focus on ROI |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 31 |
| 1 |
|
consolidation |
| 2 |
|
coming down from hype |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 32 |
| 1 |
|
Improving options in eLearning
platforms/options |
| 2 |
|
Increasing reliance on these
options |
| 3 |
|
Increasing comfort with them |
| 4 |
|
Culture shift away from travel |
| 5 |
|
Culture shirt toward collaboration at a
distance | |
| 33 |
| 1 |
|
more elearning nternally accepted |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 34 |
| 1 |
|
Acceptance of the value of eLearning
|
| 2 |
|
No
more missionary selling |
| 3 |
|
Very sophistictated customer use cases: HP,
CISCO |
| 4 |
|
Recognition of LCMS as a distinctive
application |
| 5 |
|
Continued innovation in technology
platforms | |
| 35 |
| 1 |
|
consolidation |
| 2 |
|
user-friendly software |
| 3 |
|
growing recognition of communities |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 36 |
| 1 |
|
focus on results not hype or
technology |
| 2 |
|
shift to quality |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 37 |
| 1 |
|
More discussions of using the web for
training. |
| 2 |
|
More adoption of DSL as minimal bandwidth
req. |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 38 |
| 1 |
|
emphasis on meaningful learning |
| 2 |
|
;
not just PowerPoint HTML presentations |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 39 |
| 1 |
|
interest in learning efficacy |
| 2 |
|
interest in performance support |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 40 |
| 1 |
|
Renewed focus on content quality over
infrastructure |
| 2 |
|
Growth of SCORM interoperability
initiative |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
| 1 |
|
vendor consolidation |
| 2 |
|
standards enforcement by customer |
| 3 |
|
customer awareness |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 43 |
| 1 |
|
Blended Learning getting real |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 44 |
| 1 |
|
nobody said training was a bad idea |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 45 |
| 1 |
|
interest in e-learning evaluation |
| 2 |
|
interest in e-learning R&D |
| 3 |
|
focus on standards |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| |
| 46 |
| 1 |
|
interest in online offerings |
| |